Matrisch set to be sworn in to Manor Council
Manor's newest councilman already has been a regular at borough meetings over the past year.
Mike Matrisch, a borough resident for five years, will be sworn in during council's reorganization meeting on Monday night.
Matrisch, a Democrat who received write-in nominations to appear on both parties' ballots, received the most votes in November among the four candidates for four open council seats. Incumbents Bruce Hartman, Jim Morgan and Steve Ira also will be sworn in for new four-year terms.
A married father of two, Matrisch graduated from Penn-Trafford High School in 1995 and received a bachelor's degree in criminal justice from Waynesburg University five years later. He has been a truck driver for Howard Gasoline and Oil Co. for the past 13 years.
“I love the community,” said Matrisch, 36. “I want to do what I can to help out.”
Matrisch will become the only Democrat on the seven-person council. In April, his new council colleagues chose Ira instead of him to fill a vacancy caused by the resignation of Chuck Konkus.
Matrisch has attended most of the council meetings over the past year but said he doesn't have any particular concerns about the borough as an incoming councilman.
“I just want to keep the community going the way it is, (but) I wouldn't mind seeing a few more small businesses around here,” Matrisch said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.