Harrison City-Export Road to close
A change of plans on how to build a bridge along Harrison City-Export Road will save $140,000 and shorten the construction period by about three months, Westmoreland County Engineer Henry Fitz said.
Depending on the weather conditions, the Penn Township road might be closed as early as Monday as construction crews continue work on a project that is on pace to end in August, Fitz said.
The scheduled closure of three to four months is longer than state and county officials initially estimated last year when Mele & Mele & Sons Inc. received a $2.2-million contract for the project.
Under the original plan, local traffic would have been able to drive on the road as crews closed one lane to work on an expanded bridge over a creek near the Route 130 intersection, Fitz said. Toward the end of the project, the road would have been closed for two to three weeks.
But over the course of regular construction meetings, government officials and the contractor decided closing the road was the best course for the project.
“Everyone said, with the money savings and completing the job three months sooner, that it was a win-win situation,” Fitz said.
The road already was closed for a few weeks in late October and early November because of the relocation of a sanitary sewer line and other utilities.
Though Harrison City-Export Road is a heavily traveled route in the township, Penn Township Manager Bruce Light said local officials agreed with the decision to close the road.
At times when the road was open partially during rush hour, vehicles near the Route 130 intersection stacked back to Bushy Run Road in the east and Penn-Trafford High School in the west, he said.
“It just became instant gridlock,” Light said. “It was horrible.”
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sunoco mistakenly puts part of pipeline on Penn Township land
- Level Green VFD nears closing on Proskin rec center
- Penn Township officials move to ban fracking ponds
- Workers at Penn-Trafford High School discover damaged pipes
- Trafford Council streamlines problem-tenant ordinance