To match standards imposed by the Penn-Trafford School District, Penn Township commissioners on Monday raised the gross-income exemption for paying the occupation resident tax by $2,000 to $12,000 a year.
The $10 tax, which has been in place for a few decades, is split between the school district and the township, Solicitor Les Mlakar said. Those who earn more than the exempted amount pay the tax regardless of the municipality in which they work.
The tax will generate an estimated $25,000 for the township in 2014, Mlakar said.
Commissioners are interviewing four candidates to become the township's next emergency-management coordinator.
The new coordinator will replace George Adamson.
The candidates are scheduled to complete their interviews on Feb. 5 so that commissioners can make a recommendation to Gov. Tom Corbett, who approves all municipal emergency-management coordinators.
Adamson, who is resigning, has had the position since 2009.
Township officials might resume work on a draft of local drilling regulations after the state Supreme Court in December struck down a state law limiting municipal powers.
Last week, Mlakar suggested that the township continue to consider passing a local ordinance because the ongoing litigation over Act 13, the state's law governing drilling, could go on for years.
Penn Township officials stopped work on a 21-page draft in 2012, as legal challenges to the state law went through the state's appellate courts.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.