Construction at Penn-Trafford High School tentatively is scheduled to start in mid- to late June, which is a few weeks later than the district's consultants had projected in December.
Project architect Hank Tkacik said Monday that the revised time frame is based on the expectation that the state Department of Education will issue its approval for possible partial reimbursement by late May. Daniel Kiefer of Massaro CM Services, the district's construction manager, previously estimated that construction would begin shortly after the school year ends on May 23.
Starting construction in mid- to late June would not affect the scheduled completion date in August 2016, Kiefer said.
The school board tentatively plans to begin soliciting bids on May 16 for a remodeling that it has capped at $32 million. The board likely will have to reschedule a meeting in June to award contracts because the June 12 deadline is three days after its last advertised meeting of the month.
Tkacik is going through the process of submitting project information to the state's PlanCon program for potential reimbursement, but state officials have not committed any funding for the project. State officials have imposed a moratorium on payouts for new projects, but Penn-Trafford beat a deadline to apply for funding that eventually could provide as much as a 30-percent reimbursement.
The district's timeline for awarding contracts likely won't be delayed further unless PlanCon officials don't complete their review of the bid specifications and drawings by late May, Tkacik and Kiefer said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.