Penn-Trafford rallies to support rival after crisis
Franklin Regional hasn't felt like much of a rival to Penn-Trafford over the past week.
The usual, healthy competition between neighboring school districts vanished in the moments immediately after the April 9 stabbing attack inside Franklin Regional Senior High School.
P-T administrators rushed to help Franklin officials reunite unharmed students with their parents; P-T students traded in their green-and-gold garb on April 11 to wear Franklin's blue and gold in support.
Penn-Trafford School Board members requested a moment of silence at their meeting Monday night for the 21 injured students and one security guard. Four still were hospitalized -- including three in critical condition -- as of Monday night.
“I know they're improving, but they have a long way to go,” school board President Toni Ising said.
P-T students, who signed a banner saying they stood with Franklin students, are arranging a sale of FR-themed T-shirts as a fundraiser for the victims.
Penn-Trafford has been one of several districts in the region to step up in some way or another, Franklin Regional officials said.
“I'm very appreciative of their support and assistance, and look forward to having continued, as promised, support and assistance as we move through and deal with this tragedy as a community and as a school family,” Franklin Regional Superintendent Jamie Piraino said.
Staff Writer Renatta Signorini contributed to this story.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.