Fishing derby returning to Penn Township park
After a one-year hiatus, the Carson's Hope Fishing Derby is back this weekend at Penn Township Municipal Park.
This will be the third free derby in memory of Carson Rudick, a township boy who was 5 when he died of cancer in 2010. Carson's family was unable to hold the derby last year because a park project included the expansion of the pond and necessitated that it be closed to park visitors.
Carson's mother, Carlie Rudick, said the Sunday morning derby celebrates the boy's love of fishing, particularly with his father, Jim. Two years ago, the derby attracted 130 contestants.
“We are glad to have the derby up and running again,” Rudick said in an email. “The pond looks great. It's much bigger, and the kids should have a lot more room to fish this year.”
Since Carson's death, his family set up Carson's Hope Charitable Trust to support pediatric-cancer research. It raises about $30,000 a year through fundraisers, Rudick said.
The Rudicks now have a 2-year-old daughter and are expecting another daughter in June.
“We feel that they are gifts from Carson,” Rudick said. “He sent them to us. We have our moments when our 2-year-old does things like him or makes a certain look like he did. It's bittersweet.
“But when I hold her, I can feel him, and I'm sure it will be the same when his littlest sister arrives, too.”
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.