Trafford Council again is considering a revival of the borough's crime watch.
It has been a decade since borough officials last developed a neighborhood watch, which fizzled out within a few years. Some residents expressed an interest in restarting the program, said Councilwoman Vicki Megon, who heads the borough's public-safety committee.
Council members are in the midst of scheduling a public meeting to discuss the new program and designate a coordinator, Megon said.
Though Trafford has a “top-notch police force,” some residents are worried about the spread of illegal drugs in the region, Councilman Kris Cardiff said.
During his campaign last fall for a two-year seat on council, Cardiff said he thought having a crime-watch program in town is important.
“Many residents have children, and they are concerned about their safety,” Cardiff said in an email. “Fortunately, in comparison to many other communities, Trafford is a safe place to live, but the residents want to ensure it stays that way.
“People are motivated to protect their families and get involved in the community, and there has been a great response to the idea of a crime-watch program.”
Both Megon and Cardiff said residents will be invited to participate in the regular meetings for the crime watch, which will be subject to the state's open-meeting law requirement because four of the seven council members are on the committee organizing the program.
Police Capt. Carmen Disso did not respond to a message requesting comment about the program.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.