500 petition Trafford to reverse new parking regulations
Some downtown Trafford residents and workers are asking borough council to reverse its new parking regulations in the borough's business district after the removal of unmonitored coin-operated meters.
Roiled by the appearance of new signs in late May advertising the borough's new two-hour parking areas downtown, opponents filled the council chambers on June 3 to complain.
Council members defended changes they said they approved in March to make more spaces available to people using downtown shops and restaurants during business hours, but Council President Rich Laird said officials would review the criticisms.
Though the signs are up now stating parking is allowed for two hours — or by permit — officials say enforcement won't begin until July.
In particular, some people last week lamented the elimination of overnight parking for downtown residents for all of the 400 block of Cavitt Avenue, parts of the 300 and 500 blocks of Cavitt, and Fourth and Fifth Streets between Brinton and Duquesne avenues.
“To make it no parking overnight, what was council thinking?” said Bill Kornrumph, who runs Rumpshakers Sports Bar Grill on Cavitt.
Kornrumph said he helped to collect the signatures of more than 500 people who want council to rescind its decision to implement two-hour parking — including for three borough-owned lots — and making Fourth Street one-way from Cavitt to Brinton.
Kornrumph complained that many residents think the changes were made to clear parking spaces for the Manchester Room, which he said some in town deride as “the Taj Mahal.”
Council paid for the development of two new parking lots featuring 48 spaces for the borough-owned Manchester Room.
Two-hour parking is in effect for the lot that has an entrance off Fourth Street behind the rental hall unless events are scheduled for the banquet facility, but overnight parking is prohibited there.
However, overnight parking is allowed in the Manchester Room lot at the corner of Cavitt and Fourth and in another lot on Cavitt across from the post office.
But postal employees such as Bill Laspin are upset that the Cavitt lot near their office is included in the changes. Laspin said he and his co-workers, who often park there, now might have to move their vehicles throughout the day; buy a $100-per-year parking pass; or park farther away, which would lengthen their walk to the office.
“Start coming to meetings,” Laspin said to the audience after addressing council. “We got a wake-up call.”
Councilman John Daykon, who first proposed creating the business-parking district, said the changes downtown had nothing to do with the community room.
Instead, council decided to remove the aging meters — which cost at least $3,000 to recalibrate every few years — and impose restrictions preventing some drivers from leaving their vehicles in front of businesses all day.
Daykon said the changes fulfill one of the planks of the borough's comprehensive plan: adding more parking downtown.
“Cavitt is our business district,” Daykon said. “We understand that residents are there, but it's a business district first.”
Trafford hasn't had a meter attendant in recent years. With the lapse of an employee vigorously enforcing meter violations, council downgraded its expected annual revenue from meters from $3,500 in 2012 to $1,800 in 2013.
But council revised the cost of monthly parking permits by lowering the cost from $25 per month to $10.
“We tried to actually make this easier (on people parking downtown),” Daykon said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.