Area receives $61K in drilling impact fees
Another round of state drilling-impact fees means more than $61,000 will come to Penn-Trafford School District communities in early July.
Collectively, the municipalities are getting 6.6 percent more than last year's allotment based on a formula that accounts for drilling within and near a community's borders.
This is the third year of funding from the state Public Utility Commission following the creation of the fee in 2012 by state lawmakers.
Statewide, the fee generated $225.8 million in 2013, up 11.4 percent from 2012.
Locally, Penn Township leads the way with $49,340, followed by Manor, $7,269; Trafford, $3,269; and Penn Borough, $1,289.
Penn Township already has budgeted the money for its $1.36-million summer road-paving project, finance director Linda Iams said. Last year, the township used some of its funding for the installation of a prefabricated temporary bridge on Saunders Station Road.
After reserving $14,114 from the two previous rounds of funding in a separate account, Manor Council spent the first $4,576 in May for two Motorola radios for the borough's emergency operations center. Manager Joe Lapia said council hasn't yet discussed how to spend the remaining money, but officials anticipated discussing road-paving options at their meeting on Wednesday night before deadline for this issue.
Trafford's practice has been to pledge the impact fees and other revenues from gas wells in the borough to the recreation account, Manager Jeff McLaughlin said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.