Share This Page

Trafford manager, councilwoman resign

| Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 12:24 p.m.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Penn
Jeff McLaughlin, pictured here in a March 2013 photo from his first day on the job in Trafford, resigned as borough manager this week.
file photo
Councilwoman Vicki Megon resigned from her Trafford Council position Tuesday night.

Trafford Manager Jeff McLaughlin and Councilwoman Vicki Megon have decided to move on.

Council accepted both officials' resignations on Tuesday night.

McLaughlin, who had been on the job since March 2013, will be replaced on a part-time basis by Virginia Finnegan, who has been serving as the interim Harmony Township manager.

Councilman John Daykon said Finnegan, who lives in Monroeville, is expected to start in mid-July.

Meanwhile, Megon, who joined council in 2010, tearfully offered her resignation. Though she credited council members for making “great strides in this town over the past five or six years,” Megon said she thought the borough was lacking in other areas, like being able to retain volunteers.

“At this time, I do not feel we are striving for the same things,” she said.

Megon said she would continue to be involved in planning the borough's Holiday Happenings event.

Council set a July 18 deadline for residents who want to submit letters describing their interest in the seat.

Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-871-2363 or cforeman@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.