McLaughlin resigns; Trafford taps CPA as interim manager
Jeff McLaughlin stepped aside as Trafford's manager last week with an eye toward a job closer to his background in economic development and community revitalization.
Meanwhile, his replacement, Virginia Finnegan, is looking forward to a shorter commute and joked that “I can see Trafford from my house” in Monroeville.
Trafford's borough management is in transition after McLaughlin resigned on July 1 to pursue other opportunities and as Finnegan wraps up an interim stint later this month as manager in Harmony Township in Beaver County.
After jobs with Uniontown's redevelopment authority and the Mon Valley Initiative, McLaughlin arrived in Trafford in March 2013 as the first borough manager since the mid-1990s. But McLaughlin conceded he might have come in thinking the job duties were a little different from the jack-of-all-trades nature of a borough manager in a small town.
Administrative tasks such as keeping up with the borough's bills and managing the new Manchester Room banquet space left little time for the things he said were more in his “comfort zone,” such as working with the Trafford Economic and Community Development Corp. or applying for grants for the police department.
Council members have credited him for crafting the application that helped Trafford get a $215,120 state grant to refurbish Westmoreland Park.
“It's a pretty amazing little town,” said McLaughlin, 52, of North Braddock. “For it being so small, the people have a lot of pride.”
In Finnegan, Trafford Council is bringing in a longtime municipal administrator and certified public accountant who has worked in several communities, including stints as financial manager in Ross Township and Wilkinsburg. She also serves on the Monroeville Finance Authority.
Finnegan, 69, said she is looking forward to starting in Trafford after being a finalist for the job last year.
“I got really good vibes,” Finnegan said. “It seems to be a very dedicated council that wants to go in a positive direction.”
Finnegan worked in Ross for 11 years until the board there voted 5-4 to fire her in 2006. After she filed a federal lawsuit, a jury decided in October 2008 that township officials sexually discriminated against her.
Among her positions since then was a nine-month role in 2010 as interim manager and finance consultant for Clairton. After her departure, Clairton Council voted 3-0 — with two abstentions — for Finnegan to repay the city for vacation and personal time that officials said she paid herself without their approval.
Finnegan described the situation as a “communication issue” that was “resolved very amicably” when she repaid the city. Clairton's mayor, Rich Lattanzi, and manager, Howard Bednar, did not return phone calls requesting comment.
Asked about the situation in Clairton, Trafford Councilman John Daykon said borough officials “properly vetted” Finnegan and are satisfied with her background. Finnegan will work part time in Trafford without benefits, Daykon said. Finnegan will earn $45 an hour.
“We want to see how it works out and go from there,” he said.
Finnegan's hiring on an interim basis last year in Harmony Township contributed to the building of a criminal case against the township's former secretary, who is accused of stealing $190,000 from the municipal coffers from 2006 to 2013.
Among the financial discrepancies in the township, Finnegan determined that cash payments for sewage and garbage collection were not deposited into township accounts.
Harmony Township Commissioner Paul Kokoski said he would “highly recommend” Finnegan, based on her one year there before the board hired a permanent manager last month.
“She did a very good job for us,” Kokoski said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-871-2363 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.