Penn-Trafford School Board OKs bonds for school remodeling project
The Penn-Trafford School Board has committed to issuing more bonds to pay for the $31 million high school remodeling project.
Officially, the school board voted 6-0 Monday night to authorize the issuing of as much as $16.4 million in bonds. However, officials and district consultants say the actual amount financed will end up being less than that.
The school board already generated about $19 million worth of revenue through bond issues in 2012 and 2013, and officials estimate less than $13 million will be issued in the coming months to complete the financing.
All along, the school board has pledged to finance the project by rolling over expiring debts into this project.
“We're still within our existing debt structure,” said Brett Lago, the district's business manager.
The district's financial consultants will continue to monitor the bond market as the school board decides whether to approve another bond issue or two.
Penn-Trafford officials also are holding out hope that some reimbursement might be available through the state Department of Education's program known as PlanCon. State legislators recently lifted a two-year moratorium on funding for new projects, but some districts with projects already in the pipeline have been waiting for payments they were counting on to recoup costs.
“I guess we'll take that as a good sign,” Assistant Superintendent Scott Inglese said of the moratorium's end.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-871-2363 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.