Council looks at restructuring of public works division
Big changes are on the horizon for Plum's public works department.
Plum Council on Monday night is expected to consider approving early-retirement agreements for longtime public works director Bill Berchick and another employee as well as hiring four new employees as part of a restructuring plan.
Plum manager Michael Thomas said the realignment of the department that includes eliminating the public works director position and promoting two employees to administrative positions — one to oversee the streets and roads and another to manage the buildings and grounds operation — is expected to save the borough $95,000 a year.
“The borough has grown so much in the last 15 to 20 years,” Thomas said during the council work session earlier this week. “It's too much for one person to manage the whole thing.”
Thomas declined to disclose the name of the other potential retiree pending council's vote on the early-retirement agreements that members are scheduled to discuss Monday night.
Berchick, public works director for 24 years, declined to discuss his potential retirement plans pending council's consideration of the early retirement agreements.
Thomas said the four potential hirings will help beef up the department that has fallen in numbers over the years due to retirements and lack of hirings.
Thomas said the department had 21 laborers in 2005, compared to 14 now.
Councilman Keith Nowalk, personnel committee chairman, said, if hired, the four candidates' start dates would be dependent upon them finishing their current jobs.
The potential early retirements and subsequent hirings are not the only changes. Construction of a new, multimillion dollar facility is underway in the Renton section of Plum.
A portion of the new public works facility — the salt storage building — has been completed, Thomas said.
Construction of a 21,000-square-foot building and garage with a capacity for 25 vehicles, bays for mechanics and lifts for vehicles is under way on borough property between Renton Road and Old Leechburg Road. Council earlier this year awarded $7.1 million in contracts for the new facility.
The public works facility is located at the borough building site off New Texas Road. Berchick has said the 40-year-old building has many deficiencies including a lack of office space and a lack of indoor storage for vehicles.
Berchick said the building, vehicles and equipment are exposed to salt and need numerous repairs.
Also planned at the new site are offices, a training room, restrooms, locker rooms and a kitchen area. The site will have parking, including 25 employee spaces.
Council on Monday night is expected to consider change orders for the project including nearly $150,000 related to moving unsuitable soil from the construction site.
Assistant Manager Greg Bachy said about $300,000 has been spent on change orders. Money for change orders is in a contingency fund that is separate from the project fund.
“We are halfway through the project, and we are not halfway through the contingency fund,” Bachy said.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.