Plum Council considers slashing tax rate to counter assessments
Plum Council is eyeing a property tax rate decrease.
Plum Manager Michael Thomas said council members in a few months are expected to vote on lowering the borough tax rate from 4.3 — the current rate — to about 3.7.
A mill in Plum generates about $1.2 million.
Thomas said the proposed move is a result of the county property reassessment process. Under state law, taxing bodies cannot reap more than an additional 5 percent in revenue as a result of reassessments and must adjust tax rates accordingly. Thomas said property values overall in Plum increased 20 percent as a result of the reassessments.
“Municipalities are not permitted to achieve a windfall,” Thomas said. “As a result, the borough will reduce the tax millage (rate) by about 20 percent.”
Thomas said the exact amount of the proposed tax rate decrease will depend upon the outcome of assessment appeals currently under way at the county. He expects a council vote on lowering the tax rate in April or May just prior to tax bills being mailed to property owners.
The manager said a property owner whose home is assessed at $150,000 pays $645 a year in borough taxes. Thomas said if the property owner's assessment remains at $150,000, the lowered tax rate would result in a borough tax bill of $525 or a $120 savings.
A 20 percent assessment increase would result in no increase in borough taxes for most property owners, Thomas said. A 50 percent assessment increase on a $150,000 home would result in borough taxes increasing about $140, Thomas said.
“Some people will see nothing (increase or decrease in borough taxes), some will see a tax increase, and some will see a tax decrease,” Thomas said.
Borough council in December voted to approve the 2013 budget of $11 million that did not raise taxes and kept the millage at 4.3.
Council President Mike Doyle praised borough staff members for working to pare down the budget that initially contained a $1 million deficit.
Doyle also said some property owners have expressed concerns that their borough taxes will increase significantly.
“I have a heard a few things including that council is gouging taxpayers in the borough (as a result of the reassessments),” Doyle said.
“If someone tells you we are gouging taxpayers because of the property assessments, tell them I called them a liar.”
The Plum School Board has not made any decision with respect to the property reassessment situation and the tax rate, board member Sal Colella said. The board typically votes on its annual budget in June.
“We are doing our budget, and we will look at it,” Colella said.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8753, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.