ShareThis Page

Wages still sticking point in student-transportation dispute in Plum

| Wednesday, March 6, 2013, 9:02 p.m.

Dear Editor:

After negotiating for a year with the school district, we have reached agreement on all areas of the contract except wages.

The contract expired July 31, 2012, and we have continued to work without a contract.

The school district is entertaining a bid to contract student transportation to First Student Transportation.

Our efforts to reach an agreement have been made more difficult because the contractor, who was the lowest bidder, has been allowed to rebid twice at a lower price each time.

The original bid to supply service is only lower than our current transportation budget because of a one-time offer to buy the bus fleet (which has been purchased with your tax dollars) for $l.4 million.

Once this money is used to balance the first year's deficit, what will the district sell off next year and the year after that to cover ongoing deficits?

A fact-finding report giving the employees a wage freeze for one year and increases of 25 cents and 35 cents over a three-year contract has been accepted twice by the employees and rejected twice by the district.

The employees have offered wage concessions, which have not been accepted by the district.

The latest offer from the district is a 20-percent reduction in wages for all bargaining-unit members or acceptance of employment with independent contractor First Student for a lesser wage than we are now making and unemployment benefits during school recesses without benefits, union representation or pension provisions and no guarantee that all current school district employees would be hired or retained.

The approximate salaries of the school district administration (who have all gotten raises of at least 2 percent) totals about $2 million plus benefits representing more than the total budget of the transportation department.

If the administration were required to take the same loss of 20 percent and loss of benefits the savings over three years would be about $3.25 million.

It has not been proven that there would be any guaranteed savings with outsourcing, especially going forward, but it has been proven over the years that district-operated transportation is competitive and beneficial to the students and parents of the district.

We encourage the parents and students of the district to contact school board members and show their support for the transportation department and the bus drivers who have been taking the students to school safe and efficiently for more than 30 years.

Donna MeanorPresident of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1595

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.