Two new school psychologists hired in Plum
Dana Iera had considered a career in international business.
Iera, 27, studied in London during her first semester at West Virginia University.
Iera decided during her college years that traveling for a career was not what she wanted to do.
“I am family oriented,” Iera said. “I love kids, and traveling in the business world was not the right fit for me.”
Iera and Kelly Gibson, 26, are the new school psychologists in the Plum School District.
Both were hired in February. Each is being paid $50,000 a year.
The two replace Dawn Andrews, who retired in January.
Superintendent Timothy Glasspool said the decision to hire two school psychologists was made, in part, to offer more to students.
“We want to provide additional and increased levels of personalized services to our growing special-education and gifted-education children and their families,” Glasspool said.
About 11 percent of the district's 4,000 students are enrolled in the special-educations programs, Kathleen Shirey, the district's supervisor of special education, has said.
Both Gibson and Iera said they were interested in the job opportunity in Plum because they wanted to return to the Pittsburgh area.
Gibson said she and Iera have had a busy month since they began their jobs with getting to know their colleagues, including Shirey, and administering testing to special-education students.
“Mrs. Shirey has a wealth of knowledge,” Iera said.
“We are lucky to be working with her. And the three of us are working well together.”
Shirey could not be reached for comment for this story.
The two expect a more clear delineation of duties as they start the 2013-14 school year.
“I am happy to be a part of this district,” Gibson said.
“I've heard a lot of good things about it.”
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8753, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.