Scholarship to be awarded in late former Plum teacher's name
The day after Carolyn Nonnenberg died last year, her family set out to keep her memory alive.
“We wanted to get a scholarship fund set up,” said Eric Nonnenberg, 46, one of Carolyn Nonnenberg's sons.
Carolyn Nonnenberg died on July 25, 2012 after battling cancer. She retired in 2005 after nearly 40 years as a teacher in the district.
The family's dream has turned into a reality with the establishment of the Carolyn S. Nonnenberg Memorial Scholarship that is scheduled to be awarded to a Plum High School senior May 20 during the senior awards program.
The $1,000 scholarship will be awarded to a senior who attended Plum for at least one year and is accepted to any continuing education institution.
Applicants are required to fill out an application that is available in the guidance office and write a 500-word essay about how they have been involved in the Plum community and made a positive impact.
The essay also should explain how the applicant's education has had a positive influence in helping form future goals.
Eric Nonnenberg said his mother was dedicated to education. Carolyn Nonnenberg also was involved in community organizations including the Plum Borough Community Library and the Presbyterian Church of Plum Creek.
Nonnenberg said contributions can be taken to any S&T Bank branch, or mailed to Eric Nonnenberg, 4491 Hilty Roard, Murrysville, PA 15668, with checks made payable to Carolyn S. Nonnenberg Memorial Scholarship.”
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.