Plum teacher pay raises to be based on student performance
Performance-based pay has made its way to the Plum School District.
The Plum School Board last week voted to approve a new four-year agreement with the district's administrators in which salary increases, in part, will be tied to student performance.
“It's the first time we've used pay for performance,” board member Sal Colella said. “It sets a different bar.”
The Act 93 Agreement — as it is named — covers administrators' employment terms including evaluations, compensation and fringe benefits for about 20 district employees including Superintendent Timothy Glasspool, building principals, athletic director, technology and food service directors, among others.
The Act 93 employees each received 2 percent raises last year. The new agreement extends from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2017.
Glasspool said beginning July 1, a total of 36 possible points on a 100-point evaluation scale will be related to student performance.
Glasspool said the administrators will be evaluated based upon adequate yearly progress (AYP) that measures how each school in a district is performing academically according to results of the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment scores. Results of the Keystone Exams also will be taken into consideration.
All Plum schools, with the exception of Pivik Elementary, made AYP in both math and reading last year. Pivik made AYP in math. The school, though, has been placed on the state's warning list as a result of its reading score.
The district's students also exceeded the state average scores on the Keystone exams, except in algebra I.
The tests were administered last December.
Glasspool said administrators such as the technology and food service director are being held to the same standards as others who are more on the front lines of education because “everyone has a hand in student achievement.”
Tom Templeton, assistant executive director of the Pennsylvania School Boards Association said under legislation enacted last year, superintendents hired as of September 2012 are subject to an evaluation process that includes student performance on standardized tests.
Other administrators and teachers will fall under the mandate “over the next couple years,” Templeton said.
Templeton said some school districts across the state are including student performance in the evaluations of all administrators even though they are not mandated to do so at this time.
“The driving force would be accountability, transparency and the need to develop clear measures to evaluate performance and to thoughtfully justify employment decisions related to superintendents in particular,” Templeton said.
Plum School Board President Andrew Drake aims to extend performance pay for teacher evaluations.
“We have to do this with the teacher's contract,” Drake said during the meeting.
Plum Borough Education Association President Martha Freese did not respond to an email seeking comment.
The district's contract with its 275 teachers expires June 30, 2014.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.