Plum alternative education program to continue for 2013-14
Seventeen Plum High School students can remain in an alternative education program this fall.
The Plum School Board on Tuesday night approved an agreement in which the district will pay tuition for its students enrolled at the Boyce Campus Middle College High School, also known as BCMC, at the Community College of Allegheny County's Boyce Campus in Monroeville.
The district is set to pay $7,000 per student or $119,000 for the program, Superintendent Timothy Glasspool said.
The Penn Hills School District will provide the teachers. Students from the Gateway School District also are enrolled in the program.
Plum's two teachers will be brought back to the district. A guidance counselor from BCMC is set to be laid off, board member Joe Tommarello said.
The board had considered eliminating the middle college high school program, at a cost of $246,228, during budget discussions. The Penn Hills School District's proposal to pay for the teachers and the rent of the facility led to the Plum School Board's decision to continue the district's participation.
The Penn Hills School Board also is expected to consider voting on the proposal at its meeting tomorrow, June 27.
Plum School Board member Sal Colella who on Tuesday night voted in favor of the district's $56 millon budget said he is pleased the program will remain intact for the district's students.
“It was absolutely essential that we provide those 17 students the opportunity to finish their academic careers at BCMC,” Colella said. “It's the right thing to do.”
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.