ShareThis Page

Plum school administrators receive 2-percent raises

| Tuesday, July 16, 2013, 4:33 p.m.

For the second consecutive year, the majority of Plum School District administrators each got 2-percent raises.

“With PSSA scores (Pennsylvania System of School Assessment) up in nearly every category, they deserve it,” said Plum School Board member Joe Tommarello, education committee chairman.

School board members each year evaluate the administrators and reach a consensus on the amount of salary increases. They also can opt for no increases.

The increases for the 2013-14 school year amounted to about $30,000. Tommarello said the administrators also are paying more for their health benefits.

Additionally, Superintendent Timothy Glasspool took a wage freeze for the next two years of his contract.

“I thank them for helping out in these troubled financial times,” Tommarello said.

Board member Loretta White voted against the increases. White said she values the contributions of the administrators but thought wage freezes were wise given the financial challenges in the district.

The board last month voted to use about $1 million from the district's reserve fund to help balance the budget.

The board also voted to cut the family and consumer sciences program at the high school resulting in three teacher layoffs.

“My policy has been since everyone is taking a wage freeze except for anything contractual, I would not vote for increases,” White said.

Each of district's nearly 270 teachers is set to receive about a 3.5-percent salary increase, according to the Plum Borough Education Association's contract with the district.

Some teachers also are scheduled to receive step increases that are based upon a teacher's level of experience. White also thanked Glasspool for taking a wage freeze.

“I commend him,” White said. “I think he really has a great interest in education.”

Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at 412-856-7400, ext. 8753, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.