Plum school board resurrects activity fees
Plum School Board plans to restructure a proposed activity fee that was expected to glean the district about $92,000.
The proposed policy that was tabled during last week's meeting would have charged each high school student $100 and each junior high student $50 to participate in any extracurricular activities.
The proposal called for a $10 fee for students who receive reduced priced lunches. No fee was going to be charged to students who receive free lunches.
“I prefer to see something along the lines of a prorated policy,” said board member Shane McMasters.
“Activities that don't cost as much don't require the same amount (of money) from students across the board.”
“I think the (proposed) fees are too high,” said board member Kevin Dowdell. “It's not fair for students who participate in one activity like powder puff football.”
Dowdell said according to the proposed structure, students who participate in activities such as band, orchestra and chorus also would pay the fee.
Dowdell doesn't agree with those activities being subject to a fee.
“Those are programs,” Dowdell said.
The district about six years ago charged junior and senior high students $50 activity fees, Dowdell said. The initiative was stopped when the district had difficulty collecting the fees.
Dowdell said he paid the fee for his children.
“As a parent, I felt it was my responsibility to support my children so they could participate in activities,” Dowdell said. “It's important to have activities. It's the personality of the district. Students make friends by participating in activities.”
Board member Joe Tommarello last year opposed an activity fee but is willing to reconsider his position because of financial considerations.
“This year it's much worse,” Tommarello said.
Board members are expected to discuss activity fee proposals during a policy committee meeting on Aug. 6.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- With tax increase looming, Plum School Board takes a swipe at cutting expenses
- Plum Boy Scout troop has decorated VA trees for a decade
- Plum budget holds taxes, but adds ‘flood mitigation fee’
- A vision for Sugar Plum Days: Support efforts launched for 2015 return throughout Plum
- Plum Council OKs budget with no tax increase
- Holiday Park firefighters want emergency signal near station in Plum