Plum councilman, sued by VFW, removes name from ballot
Councilman Keith Nowalk, who is being sued by the Holiday Park Volunteer Fire Department, said Tuesday he will not seek re-election in November.
“I have withdrawn my name from the November ballot for re-election,” Nowalk said in a statement emailed Tuesday night to the Plum Advance Leader.
“I want to take this time off to clarify my obligations with the Holiday Park VFD regarding Nowalk Daily Grind. Due to the economic conditions that many of us face and the fact that our firemen are our local heroes, I regret the situation in so many ways.
“I am obligated to focus on my family and business in ‘14 and forward. I want to thank all the residents of Plum for giving me a opportunity to serve and will always be proud that I was part of the most proactive and productive majorities in borough history while maintaining fiscal responsibility for the benefit of all residents.
“Thank you for the opportunity these past four years to serve all the residents of Plum.”
Nowalk had no further comment.
The Holiday Park Volunteer Fire Department in May sued Nowalk in the civil division of county Common Pleas Court seeking $196,536 for what it contends is his failure to pay rent on a building owned by and next door to the fire department on Route 286 in Plum.
The fire department said in the complaint that a portion of the amount was for renovations to the space that Nowalk converted into a coffee house and pizzeria.
Nowalk, 49, a member of council's finance committee, at the end of April closed the Nowalk Daily Grind after he said he wasn't able to pay the rent — about $2,800 a month — for the first four months of the year.
Former Plum Republican Committee chairman Dave Majernik said the committee plans to meet on Aug. 14 at 7 p.m. at his home, 932 Rockland Drive, to vote on a candidate to take Nowalk's place on the November ballot.
Dell said he knows of four Republicans who are interested in seeking the four-year term.
Dell said he learned “very recently” of Nowalk's decision to withdraw from the race. He had no comment on Nowalk's decision.
The election is Nov. 5.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.