Share This Page

Millers Lane residents want a piece of paving budget

| Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Lillian DeDomenic | For the Plum Advance Leader
The upper portion of Millers Lane in the Regency neighborhood of Plum is uneven, has potholes and has been paved over in section because of a water line replacement project. The patch work is causing rough driving conditions for motorists.
Lillian Dedomenic | For The Plum Advance Leader
The upper portion of Millers Lane in the Regency neighborhood of Plum is uneven, has potholes and has been paved over in section because of a water line replacement project. The patch work is causing rough driving conditions for motorists.

Plum officials have made plans to pave nearly 20 streets this summer to the tune of almost $1 million.

Residents of Millers Lane would have liked to have had their street on the list.

“The road has turned into a complete disaster,” Walter Berkowski of Millers Lane said last month. “That road needs to be paved.”

Councilman Leonard Szarmach said the road, particularly the upper portion near the intersection with Saltsburg Road, is in “bad shape.”

In addition to some uneven pavement on the entire mile-long stretch, the Plum Borough Municipal Authority dug trenches to install water lines on the upper portion of the road, said Szarmach, public-works committee chairman.

The authority paved over the area where the trenches were dug, which created an uneven surface.

“It was a real mess (during the water-line work),” said Cathy Zelahy of Millers Lane.

“They dug out half of one side of the road and half of the other and paved over it. It is better now than how it was (with the trenches dug up).”

“I'd like to see them pave it right away,” said Zelahy who has lived on Millers Lane for 38 years.

Szarmach said he would like to see the job completed immediately, as well.

But the cost, estimated at more than $1 million to repave Millers Lane, makes it a challenge to do in one paving season.

“It would be $1 million-plus,” Szarmach said. “It's not in the budget now.”

Borough officials also have delayed work on Millers Lane because they don't know what the Plum School District plans to do with Regency Park Elementary School in the future.

Regency Park enrolls the fewest students — about 240 — among the district's five elementary buildings.

That number will decrease to four buildings with the demolition of Adlai Stevenson and construction of the new Holiday Park Elementary expected to start this fall.

If the school remains open, the borough's recommendation calls for installing sidewalks and flashing school-zone lights, which would increase costs.

Plum School Board President Andrew Drake said a decision about Regency Park is at least a couple of years away.

“We don't want to waste borough money and put in sidewalks that won't be used,” Szarmach said.

“We won't do the lower section until the board decides.

Szarmach said officials are considering repaving the upper portion of Millers Lane during next year's paving season.

“We are thinking about making it a priority for spring,” Szarmach said.

Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or kzapf@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.