Plum GOP chooses new council candidate
The Plum Borough Republican Committee has a new candidate for the November council ballot.
Dave Majernik, former committee chairman, said members on Wednesday night unanimously elected Dave Seitz, 48, vice president of the Plum Baseball & Softball Association, to replace council incumbent Keith Nowalk who earlier this month decided not to seek re-election to a four-year term.
“He (Seitz) brings a lot of community service and has a lot of ties to the community that will be helpful in the fall campaign,” Majernik said.
Seitz, who is both an attorney and an engineer, said he had been considering seeking a council seat. He joins the ticket that also has on it council incumbents Mike Doyle, Michael Dell and Leonard Szarmach.
“I am very pleased to be selected, and I am happy to be of help to Plum,” Seitz said.
Nowalk said he will complete his term that expires on Dec. 31. Nowalk is being sued by the Holiday Park Volunteer Fire Department that is seeking $196,536 for what it contends is his failure to pay rent on a building owned by and next door to the fire department on Route 286. Nowalk said earlier this month in an emailed statement to the Plum Advance Leader that he wants to focus on his family and his business.
The Republicans had until Aug. 22 to notify the Allegheny County Department of Elections of the new name for placement on the ballot, Mark Wolosik, county elections division manager, said recently.
(Read more about Seitz in the Aug. 22 issue of the Plum Advance Leader.)
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.