Plum board OKs new high school assistant principal
The Plum School Board on Tuesday night voted to approve the administration's recommendation for a new assistant principal at the high school.
Members voted 7-1 to approve the hiring of Shannon Crombie, a social studies teacher at Canon-MacMillan High School. Crombie's salary was set at $75,000. Her start date will be determined by Superintendent Timothy Glasspool, according to the board motion.
“She comes to us with great experience and great zeal,” said board member Sal Colella. “We look forward to her being a part of the administrative team.”
Board member Shane McMasters voted no. Board member Loretta White did not attend the meeting.
McMasters said he supported Maj. Scott Kolar, Air Force JROTC instructor at the high school, for the job.
“I think he (Kolar) would be more beneficial,” McMasters said.
Crombie was hired to fill the position left vacant by the departure in August of former assistant high school Principal Michael Loughren who accepted a job as high school principal in the Carlynton School District.
Crombie will join Rachel Gattuso who was hired as an assistant high school principal in September 2012 to replace Justin Stephans who was appointed principal at Regency Park Elementary.
Read more about Crombie's hiring in the Nov. 21 issue of the Plum Advance Leader.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8753 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.