Plum council approves 2014 budget
Plum Borough's balanced budget that holds the line on taxes in 2014 did not get unanimous support from council members.
Council voted 5-2 last week to approve the spending plan.
The budget projects revenue and expenses at $11.8 million, borough finance director Michael Whitico said. A $25,399 surplus is anticipated.
Councilmen Donald Knopfel and Steve “Skip” Taylor voted against the budget.
Knopfel said that he doesn't agree with some of the spending plan that runs through Dec. 31, 2014. He declined to elaborate.
The budget keeps the millage at 3.78. A mill generates a little more than $1 million. The last borough real estate tax increase was 1 mill in 2008.
Based upon the 3.78 millage, a property owner with a $150,000 home would continue to pays $567 a year in borough taxes.
The owner of a $300,000 home would continue to pay $1,134 in borough taxes.
Councilman Michael Dell, finance committee chairman, projects the general fund surplus at $1.5 million at the end of 2014.
“We made a few minor changes (from the preliminary budget),” Dell said.
“We didn't get everything we asked for, but it is a workable budget for 2014.”
One of the changes to the spending plan that occurred after last month's budget presentation was transferring $70,000 from the general fund to the fire fund, Dell said.
Dell said the money would be used toward the stipends the borough gives to each of the four volunteer fire departments and for insurance and other expenses.
The borough is slated to give the companies a total $155,952 in 2014; $160,631 in 2015 and $165,500 in 2016, according to the current agreement between the borough and the Plum Fire Chiefs' Association.
Dell said officials continue to work on a long-term plan for firetruck replacement.
The borough fund helps the four volunteer fire departments on a rotating basis purchase new trucks.
Dell also said officials increased the budget to cover auditing fees — from $36,740 to $44,240.
The extra $7,500 will pay for the cost for the borough auditor — Maher Duessel – to audit the finances of the community center, the fire departments and the sports organizations.
Another highlight of the spending plan is an allocation of $300,000 earmarked for work on Millers Lane.
The road, with its uneven pavement, is estimated to need more than $1 million in work.
The total set aside for road construction is $650,000.
Dell predicts the 2015 budget will be a challenge to balance.
“Because of increased costs coming down the road, we will have to make some adjustments,” Dell said.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8753, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.