Share This Page

Plum school board mulls solutions to rising expenses

| Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Plum School District officials are seeing expenses rise and the reserve fund dwindle as decisions on the 2014 budget loom.

“The cards we have been dealt are what we have to deal with,” Plum School Board member Tom McGough, newly appointed finance committee chairman, said during last week's finance committee meeting.

“Our eyes are wide open at this point.”

With a $1.5 million deficit projected in the 2014-15 budget, the board is looking to consider during its Jan. 28 meeting a preliminary spending plan that would ask the Pennsylvania Department of Education for permission to increase taxes higher than the prescribed index of 2.9 percent of the Plum School District millage that is 18.758.

One of the exceptions district officials are thinking about submitting to the Department of Education for consideration to raise taxes above the index is special-education costs.

Special-education costs declined from $5.7 million in 2009-10 to $5.3 million in the 2011-12 school year, according to the district.

Costs then increased in the 2012-13 to $5.6 million, and are projected to go up slightly for this school year, with $5.7 million budgeted.

The district has received about $2.2 million in state funding for special-education costs in each of the last few years, according to the district website.

The district's rate of special-education students is about 11 percent, special-education Supervisor Kathleen Shirey said.

Districts are required to apply to the state Department of Education for approval for exceptions.

If the request is approved, the department determines the dollar amount of the expenditure for which the exception is sought and the tax rate increase required to fund the exception.

If the department denies the request, the school district must reduce the tax rate increase to no more than its index or submit a referendum question for voter approval in the next primary election.

Consideration to apply to the state Department of Education for approval for exceptions is being given in light of the fact, in part, that the district's fund balance has dwindled to $1.6 million as of July 1, according to an update Tommarello said he received from business Manager Eugene Marraccini.

Raising taxes to the index would net the district about $500,000, officials have said.

The projected deficit does not include additional costs the district is expected to incur from contracts that have yet to be negotiated including the one with the district's teachers.

Also, expenses for health benefits are expected to rise about 10 to 12 percent for the 2014-15 school year, Marraccini said.

“We have a lot of heavy issues,” he said.

Tommarello, too, is concerned about rising costs.

“We cannot continue to have exorbitant expenditures and not as much revenue,” Tommarello said.

“We have to get expenses under control.”

The next finance committee meeting is scheduled for 6 p.m. on Jan. 21 in the board conference room at the high school, 900 Elicker Road.

Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or kzapf@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.