Network administrator sought by Plum School District
Technology use in the Plum School District continues to grow.
District officials have found the growth has provided a need for a new position.
The district is accepting applications for a network administrator who will report to Christopher Davis, the director of educational technology.
“With all the infrastructure, we almost need a person to handle it,” said board member Kevin Dowdell, chairman of the personnel committee. “Our network and phone system have expanded over the years.”
The district's network supports more than 2,000 computers, Dowdell said.
In addition, Davis has said the school board's decision to permit students to bring their own computing devices to school has resulted in about a 25-percent increase in the amount of traffic or data on the network.
Davis said the ‘Bring Your Own Device' policy has resulted in an additional 800 to 1,000 devices on the network each day.
The record use of the network resulted in the technology department over the summer making upgrades to the district information technology infrastructure.
The network administrator will be responsible for monitoring network performance, managing wireless infrastructure and administering the video security system, according to an ad for the position on the district's website.
The district is looking for a candidate with an associate's degree in computer science, information systems, network administration or a related field, as well as three years experience in network administration and proficiencies in various technology systems.
The salary posted for the job is $42,167. The deadline to apply is Jan. 17.
Dowdell expects a hire within the next few months.
“We aren't in crisis mode right now,” Dowdell said. “We have time and leeway.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.