Subsidence causes road closure of Plum's Center Road
Work was expected to start this week on a portion of Center Road in Plum that remains closed to traffic because mine subsidence was causing it to collapse, Allegheny County officials said Monday.
Stephen Shanley, the county's public works director, said on Monday that a repair plan involves pouring a grout mixture or thin mortar into the area affected by the subsidence that is south of Trestle Road to north of the Boyce Park main entrance on Center Road.
The work was expected to begin on Wednesday and take several days to complete, Shanley said.
Shanley said the county is working with both the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation to fix the roadway.
Shanley said the grout mixture is expected to minimize the chances of further collapse of the roadway.
The portion of Center Road affected by the collapse has been closed since March 25. Officials said a county public works supervisor noticed a hole near the side of the road, investigated further and determined the problem was mine subsidence.
Jersey barriers are in place across the road north of the Boyce Park main entrance and south of Trestle Road preventing through access on Center Road, officials said.
Plum police advised drivers to avoid Monroeville Trestle Road between Old Frankstown Road and Saltsburg Road. Traffic should detour by using Saltsburg Road to Pierson Run Road to Old Frankstown Road, according to the county.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.