Plum manager gets salary boost with 2-year contract
Plum Manager Michael Thomas has a new contract.
Borough council at last week's meeting voted to approve a two-year agreement that is retroactive to January and runs through the end of 2015.
The contract boosts Thomas' salary from $107,000 to $119,800, according to council vice President Michael Dell.
“He has not had a raise in four years,” Dell said. “We looked at other municipalities of our size (more than 20,000 residents) and years of service (for other managers) and determined he was underpaid for his years of experience.”
Dell said council looked at salaries for managers in Shaler, Bethel Park and Cranberry.
Shaler Manager Tim Rogers' salary is $122,000; William Spagnol, Bethel Park's manager, is set to be paid $104,736; and Jerry Andree, Cranberry's manager, is being paid $139,000.
In the eastern suburbs, Monroeville Manager Tim Little's salary is $102,500. Penn Hills Manager Moe Rayan's salary is $113,000.
In the new agreement, Thomas, 48, who has been Plum's manager for nearly nine years, will pay 100 percent of the deductible or $3,000 for his family's medical benefits, Dell said.
Also, Thomas would receive a year of salary as a severance if he is fired without cause as opposed to six months as is in his previous agreement with the borough, Dell said.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.