Replacement sought for dedicated Plum councilman who moved from borough
Don Knopfel's resignation has left a vacancy on borough council.
Knopfel, 71, who had served intermittently as a councilman over the past few decades, has moved out of the borough, Manager Michael Thomas said during the June 9 council meeting.
Knopfel was not in attendance.
“Don was a very good councilman and a good asset to the community,” Councilman Leonard Szarmach said.
“He will be missed. He was not in this for the accolades. He was in it for the best interest of the community.”
“I served with him (Knopfel) in 1992 when I was first on council,” Mayor Richard Hrivnak said.
“He was a true Plum-proud resident.”
Knopfel, one of three Democrats on council and public safety committee chairman, was most recently elected in 2011.
Solicitor Bruce Dice said members of council have 30 days from council's June 9 meeting to fill the seat.
Council members plan to appoint a candidate to council during the July 7 meeting.
The appointment runs through the end of Knopfel's term — Dec. 31, 2015.
Republican Dave Seitz, 49, who unsuccessfully sought a seat on borough council in last year's election, said he plans to apply for the appointment.
The Republicans are the majority members of council with four members. If the Republicans appoint a member of the GOP to the vacant seat, the group will regain a supermajority as they gained in the 2009 council election, but lost in last year's race.
Council President Mike Doyle said he is looking for candidates who have talents in a variety of areas.
“I'm looking for someone who feels they have a certain skill set that would benefit the community be it in public works, finance, personnel, public safety, parks and recreation or economic development,” Doyle said.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.