Arrest made in Plum burglary that ended with crash at Penn Hills Service Association
A Plum man is in the Allegheny County Jail, charged in connection with a burglary in Plum that ended in a crash in Penn Hills.
Plum police said Monday they charged Jesse Joel Geraci, 31, of Saltsburg Road with one count each of burglary and criminal mischief and two counts each of theft by unlawful taking and receiving stolen property in connection with a June 17 burglary at a Regency Drive home.
A woman told police she returned home in the late morning to find that someone broke into the house and took jewelry and small electronics, according to Plum police Chief Jeff Armstrong.
Officers discovered the 1998 green Toyota Camry, reported stolen from Regency Drive in Penn Hills, and when they attempted a traffic stop, the suspect fled on Universal Road.
Police chased the car, and Armstrong said the suspect's car struck a county police vehicle before crashing into a corner of the Penn Hills Service Association building on Universal Road.
A roughly 3-by-6-foot hole caused by the crash is covered with plywood and plastic.
Ed Hoover, service association manager, the crash didn't interrupt the association's food and clothing pantries.
Plum police Lt. Lanny Conley said Geraci was arrested by Port Authority Police and the U.S. Marshal-led fugitive task force when they learned that Geraci was trying to leave the area by bus.
Conley said Penn Hills police also will file charges against Geraci stemming from the pursuit and crash.
Geraci's preliminary hearing on the Plum charges will be at 9 a.m. July 2 before District Judge Linda Zucco.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.