Million-dollar lottery ticket purchased at Plum gas station
Ron Pototsky received a piece of good news on Monday morning as he reported for work at Sheetz on Hulton Road.
“The lottery called this morning and told us we sold a winning ticket for $1 million,” said Pototsky, 26, Sheetz manager.
The Sheetz in Plum was one of two in the eastern suburbs to sell a $1 million top-prize ticket from the July 5 Millionaire Raffle drawing. The other location is on Route 22 in Wilkins.
The other two stores in Pennsylvania that sold winning tickets are a Uni-Mart in Jefferson County and a Sheetz in Armstrong County.
The four $1 million top-prize raffle ticket numbers selected were: 00118772, 00279919, 00219413 and 00388503.
Each of the stores receives a $5,000 selling bonus.
The game awarded a total of 6,000 prizes worth $5,089,200.
Pototsky said Monday he didn't know the identity of the winner.
“The computer picked the numbers,” Pototsky said.
Lottery officials said they could not confirm identities of the winners until the prizes are claimed and the tickets are validated, which did not occur as of this edition's deadline.
Millionaire Raffle winners have one year from the drawing date to claim prizes.
“It is exciting,” Pototsky said.
A complete list of all 6,000 winning raffle tickets numbers is available at lottery retail locations and at www.palottery.com. Winning raffle ticket numbers are listed on the website by price category.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-871-2367 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.