Plum School Board can't move on ending contract with company that finds sub teachers
The Plum School Board remains at an impasse over the future of Kelly Educational Services.
Members on Tuesday night voted 4-4 to give 30 days notice to the firm that the district intends to terminate its contract.
Kelly provides substitute workers including teachers.
The tie vote resulted in the motion failing.
The vote was along party lines with four Democrats favoring the termination of the contract and four Republicans opposing it.
Board vice President Joe Tommarello was not in attendance.
There is no line item for Kelly Educational Services in the district's budget that was passed on June 30.
Board member Michelle Stepnick, a Democrat, said she plans to ask for the motion to be brought up again.
Board President Sal Colella wants more information from Kelly about the potential impacts of the employer mandate of the Affordable Care Act that, as of next year, requires employers including school districts to provide health insurance to those who work on average at least 30 hours a week, according to the IRS website.
“We have to get more data,” Colella said after the meeting. “We have to ask the right questions – the hard questions.”
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8753 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.