Plum Police on look out for thieves who robbed Holiday Park family
Plum police are looking for two men they say robbed a Holiday Park family.
Chief Jeffrey Armstrong said the men entered the Rainier Drive home through the front door that was unlocked shortly after midnight on Aug. 10. One of the suspects brandished a black and silver firearm, the chief said.
The men took a woman upstairs to her teen son's bedroom and demanded marijuana and cash, Armstrong said. Armstrong said the son told police he was struck in the back of the head with the suspect's gun. He did not require medical treatment.
The suspects took money and electronics and fled on foot, Armstrong said.
Police were able to view video footage of the suspects in the downstairs portion of the home because the family has security cameras that monitor the interior of the home, Armstrong said.
The suspect who carried the gun is described as a dark-skinned black male, 6 feet tall and weighing 180 to 200 pounds. He was wearing a dark-colored shirt and light-colored pants, the chief said.
The second suspect is a light-skinned black male who wore gloves and a baseball cap.
Police do not think the robbery was a random act.
“We have every reason to believe the victims and the suspects are connected,” Armstrong said.
Karen Zapf is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-871-2367 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.