East Huntingdon puts weight limit on roads
By Marilyn Forbes
Published: Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012, 8:54 p.m.
Taking the route of many other municipalities in the state, East Huntingdon Township Supervisors approved an ordinance at their Nov. 8 meeting to restrict weight on the 70 miles of township roads.
Township Solicitor Aaron Bialon said that after receiving a report of road surveys from township Engineer Doug Regola of Victor P. Regola and Associates, supervisors would pass a weight restriction of 10 tons.
“The supervisors asked me to draft an ordinance where we would restrict weigh to 10 tons on all township roads, permitting exceptions” Bialon said.
Restriction exceptions may include some construction routing and hauling and other single passage routing.
Agriculture is exempt.
Anyone wishing to attain permission on exemption other than agriculture is to visit the township building to report their exact route planned and exceptions also must be bonded to cover the cost of any damages that may occur to the township roads from the hauling.
“We are not going to pay the bill for any damages that they may create,” Bialon said.
Supervisor Joel Suter said he does not anticipate having any problems with the new restrictions.
“If we see anyone (overweight) we would go to them about it,” Suter said.
The proposed 2013 budget remains available for public viewing. A preliminary $5,126,775 spending plan was approved Oct. 25 and did not include a tax increase.
The supervisors hope to vote on and approve the budget plan at their meeting Wednesday.
Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.