Endangerment charges filed
A New Stanton woman was charged after allegedly leaving her child in an East Huntingdon Township residence that was full of drugs.
Dominique Steban, 21, of 549 Woodmere Drive, was charged Oct. 29 with endangering the welfare of children, possession of marijuana and use/possession of drug paraphernalia.
According to the criminal complaint filed by the Westmoreland County Sheriff's Department, members of the department were searching for a man with active warrants at the Huntingdon Village Apartments at about 9 a.m. Oct. 26.
The man was found in an apartment with an infant boy, whose mother — Steban — could not be located.
The warrant suspect eventually did tell Deputy Christopher Tretter that Steban had gone to a methadone clinic in Greensburg.
The complaint continued the infant began to cry a short time later. Tretter noticed a laceration in the middle of the boy's forehead that was closed by butterfly strips. He also noticed drug paraphernalia in the apartment, prompting a call to the Westmoreland County Children's Bureau
Steban returned to the residence at about 10:25 a.m. and gave authorities permission to search the apartment.
Further investigation uncovered a clear, plastic bag containing suspected marijuana, six empty heroin stamp bags, two pieces of straws with heroin residen in them, a spoon with residue and an empty half-gallon bottle of vodka.
The infant's biological father was contacted and arrived to take custody of the child.
A preliminary hearing for Steban is scheduled for Dec. 19 before Scottdale District Judge Charles Moore.
Paul Paterra is a staff editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-887-6101 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.