Scottdale campaign nets 150-200 toys for needy children
Once again this year the combined efforts of Jim Carson, owner of Carson's Tavern, and Southmoreland Middle School in Scottdale resulted in the collection of an abundance of toys for children whose parents cannot afford to buy them gifts at Christmas.
Carson said that he has received 150 to 200 toys this year and took them to the collection site in New Stanton.
“It is still a nice feeling to see the warehouse filled with toys,” Carson said. “I wanted to say ‘thank you' to the community. It takes a lot of people to pull this thing off.”
Carson has been involved in the Toys for Tots program for eight to 10 years and started contributing with the thought of his own children and to benefit less fortunate kids.
For the second straight year, Southmoreland Middle School also was involved in the program.
What started as a project for sixth-graders under the direction of social studies teacher Brian Pitts has turned into a campaign adopted by the entire school. This year that campaign brought about 100 toys. Pritts was satisfied, but he said goals are always high, and he would have loved to see that number even a bit higher. He added that it may have something to do with the economy or perhaps it was not publicized as well as it could have been.
“You're trying to do something good, you want it to be the best it can be,” Pritts said. “I think it was successful. Anytime you can get something together to make a kids' day, it's going to be successful. I think we were able to help numerous kids have something for Christmas.”
Carson and Pritts agreed that Toys for Tots is an amazing program that benefits many children.
“What Jim has done is great,” Pritts said. “I want to thank him as well as the students and staff of Southmoreland Middle School for organizing this event.”
Andrew Hesner is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.