Southmoreland seeks football coach
Football has long been a sport where having the same head coach in place for years was a key factor in whether or not that particular program was successful year in and year out.
Men like Paul “Bear “ Bryant and Joe Paterno were the staples that gave identity to the Alabama and Penn State football programs. They were sideline fixtures that drew as much attention as the game itself.
Now, the trend for young coaches is to jump into a program and build a quick reputation for themselves, then bolt for a bigger and better deal as soon as another wolf comes sniffing at the door.
Things in the high school ranks are no different.
New year, new coach, new hope.
The Southmoreland football program recently became the latest victim in the high school coaches' carousel when Dominic Pecora announced his resignation as the head coach of the Scotties' football team after a two-year stint to take over as the lead guy at East Allegheny.
Pecora, who was 7-12 during his two seasons at Southmoreland, becomes the third head coach in three seasons at East Allegheny following the resignations of Jason Ruscitto and Dennis Edwards.
Pecora had been an assistant coach at Yough, Baldwin and Norwin before taking over the Southmoreland program in 2011.
After leading the Scotties to a 4-6 record in 2011, Pecora was rewarded with a three-year contract extension that would have solidified the Scotties' football program until 2014.
Now the Southmoreland administration and Athletic Director Charlie Swink are forced to scramble to find a replacement in the middle of offseason workouts.
“This sets us back a little bit, but we will be fine,” said Swink. “It came as a bit of a surprise to us, but we understand that there are personal and travel issues that made it difficult for Dominic to stay here. We wish him well in the future, and we move on from here.”
Part of moving on involves the interviewing and hiring process, which may take some time to complete.
“We have had several people contact us expressing an interest in becoming the head coach of our football program, but we will look inside our own unit first in order to fill the position, but we are prepared to look elsewhere should the need arise,” said Swink.
When asked if there had been a drop in attendance in offseason workouts and conditioning following the resignation of Pecora, Swink pointed out that through the volunteer efforts of current assistant coaches, the kids are still hitting the weight room hard and they are dedicated to continue to making themselves better.
Swink pointed out that assistant coaches Kurt Beistel and Mark Adams have been instrumental in keeping the kids on point when it comes to conditioning, and that their continued efforts are greatly appreciated.
“We have had a nice turnout at the workouts and the kids are pushing themselves hard,” said Beistel. “I have told the kids that no matter who the coach is, that come August, there will be football to be played and that they need to prepare themselves to play football and to let the coaching stuff take care of itself.”
As for filling the head coaching position, Swink hopes to have a new coach in place in the next couple of weeks.
“We will take some time and look at where we are before we announce a replacement,” said Swink. “We want to be comfortable with our decision and to put someone in place that we feel gives us the best chance to be competitive.”
Mark King is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.