Candidates still tied for final Southmoreland School Board spot
By Paul Paterra
Published: Wednesday, June 12, 2013, 7:29 p.m.
It appears the final spot on the ballot for the general election of the Southmoreland School Board will be determined by the luck of the draw.
As of June 8, the fourth spot on the Republican ticket was deadlocked between incumbent Catherine F. Fike and Lois Eberly. The pair each nothched 358 votes on the Republican ticket in Westmoreland County and 52 votes in Fayette County.
Jim Montini, diector of the Westmoreland County Election Bureau said he would not classify the results as official, but added “all the ballots have been counted and there's a tie.”
To break the tie a number is pulled out of a bottle similar to the one in which pills are pulled out for a game of pool, something Montini said rarely is needed.
Montini added the drawing is tentatively scheduled for June 17 in Westmoreland County.
“Until the tie is broken or the drawing is held, there's really nothing to say,” Eberly said.
Fike said she'd be satisfied no matter which way the drawing goes.
“As far as I'm concerned Lois is a wonderful person,” Fike said. “It doesn't matter to me, she's really a good option for the school district.”
Fike is seeking her second term on the school board.
Already securing spots on the ballot for the Nov. 5 election were incumbents Gail Rhodes and Levi Miller (the current board president) as well as former School Director Cheryl Byers Shipley and Robert Callaro.
Byers Shipley topped both tickets with 765 Democratic votes and 508 Republican votes.
She was followed by Rhodes (721 votes), Miller (666) and Callaro (548) for the top spots on the Democratic ticket.
Miller placed second on the Republican ticket with 466 votes, followed by Rhodes (441).
Paul Paterra is a staff editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-887-6101 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Owensdale brothers’ prisoner of war tales from WWII told
- Scottdale council asked to reconsider complaint forms