ShareThis Page

Southmoreland board approves 2013-14 budget

| Monday, July 1, 2013, 6:13 p.m.

The Southmoreland School District has a budget for the 2013-2014 school year and it does not include a tax increase.

However, two school directors who voted against the spending plan again expressed their feelings that the district is heading for dire financial straights.

The board approved a budget June 27 that sets expenditures at $26,378,342 and revenues at $25,424,588. The deficit of $953,7874 is to be offset by the fund balance. Millage is set at 71.0759 mills for Westmoreland County and 14 mills for Fayette County. One mill generates approximately $108,000 for the school district.

Superintendent John Molnar said when the preliminary budget was approved May 23 that the millages were actually slightly lower than last year. The millage for the Westmoreland County in the 2012-2013 school year was 71.06 and the Fayette County millage rate was 14.0281

The motion passed by a 6-2 vote with school directors Catherine Fike and Ken Alt voting against the motion. Board President Levi Miller was not in attendance last night.

“Next year we will be bankrupt if we continue our present course, which is to use our unassigned fund balance,” Alt said. “(It's) a practice that will leave us bankrupt next year as there will be no money in the savings for which to close the budget deficit.”

Alt went on to say that the district's two previous business managers — Bill Porter and Bill Salem — also forsesaw the same dire financial straights.

“Two previous former business managers have told us we're on the path to bankruptcy,” Alt said. “When do we stop stealing from our children's piggy banks? The administration knows it has not presented this board with any viable alternatives. When do we wake up and realize this sort of budget planning is taking us into bankruptcy?....When do we start cutting the fluff. We haven't cut anything. It's time for serious discussion about finances and where to go from here.”

Molnar said at that May 23 meeting that the district's fund balance is $5.9 million and that much of the money taken from the fund balance actually will be returned.

Fike said there is an additional $704,000 being withdrawn from the fund balance. “(It's) classified as income,” she said. “It shows this budget has a $1.7 million deficit between revenues and expenses.”

Alt also reiterated a stance he and Fike have made at earlier meetings that the district should put together a financial plan covering anywhere from three to 10 years.

New Business Manager Jim Marnell said if the board directed him to do so that he would undertake that task.

“The common sense approach is always to be fiscally prudent,” Marnell said when asked by School Director Josie Kauffman for advice. Marnell added he felt the district would do just that.

The board approved a series of other motions in relation to the budget, all of which were approved by the eight board members in attendance.

These included the establishment of the real estate taxation for the 2013-2014 fiscal year. That motion included the following:

A 2-percent discount if paid between Aug. 1 and Sept. 30.

Face value when paid from Oct. 1 to Nov. 29.

Ten-percent penalty when paid on Dec. 2 and thereafter.

Paul Paterra is a staff editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-887-6101 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.