Youngsters 'digging' reading at Scottdale library
Area children are enjoying a summer packed with educational and entertaining activities this summer at the Scottdale Public Library.
The library follows the national summer reading theme of “Dig into Reading!”
A theme is developed each year from the Collaborative Summer Library Program, which surveys Pennsylvania librarians about the possibilities.
Children from pre-school through teens have had a variety of activities from which to choose. Children have read 1,720 books so far this summer.
Crowd favorites included visits from the Dinosaur Detectives from the Carnegie Science Center, Will from Mad Science of Pittsburgh, and Kelly Most, Southmoreland Primary Center autistic support teacher.
Patti Miller, library director, is thrilled with the programs offered this year. “(Children's director Rhonda) Allison has done an outstanding job and her programs rival those of libraries of a much larger population,” Miller said. “Of particular importance is the children have been introduced to science in a fun and engaging way.”
Miller said “attendance has gone through the roof” and she happy with the addition of the teen programming.
Karen Stefl, retired librarian from Southmoreland High School, has run the teen program. “She is just fantastic,” Miller said, “The kids have really enjoyed their time with Mrs. Stefl.”
Miller reminded if the library flag flies at Loucks Park Kathy Barcovtch is there to read a story. There also is a movie at 3 p.m. Thursdays.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.