'Mattie' repeats as Most Photogenic Pooch winner at Scottdale festival
For being a 3-year-old pug, Mattie Pallone has already made a name for herself in the local community.
This lovely female defended her title at the recent Scottdale Fall Festival. After winning the Most Photogenic Pooch award in 2012, Mattie returned to the 2013 competition only to win it once again.
Two titles in a row for only a 3-year-old beaut is quite impressive. The proud owners are Katie Pallone and James Bandemer, both from Scottdale.
When Mattie isn't winning awards for her beauty she can be found at the household either eating or sleeping. “Mattie's second favorite activity is napping. When she's not eating or searching the house for food, she is snuggled up on the couch dreaming about food,” Pallone said.
After the Coffmans on Pittsburgh Street had their pugs, Pallone knew she wanted one and Mattie sure hasn't disappointed.
“Every day with Mattie is quite memorable. Her little personality is like no other,” Pallone said. Congratulations to Matilda Mae Pallone on being the first featured pet of the week for 2013.
To have your pet recognized as “The Pet of the Week,” nominations may be submitted to email@example.com, or a letter may be submitted to 228 Pittsburgh St., Scottdale PA 15683 or they may be dropped off during business hours, 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 9 a.m. until 3 p.m. Friday.
Josh King is a contributing writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.