ShareThis Page

Southmoreland Middle School gridders fall to Indiana

| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

In the world of football, there are up times, down times, and times where teams simply try and rebuild a program.

For the Southmoreland Middle School football team and head coach Mike Russin, the past two seasons have held a part of all three of those ingredients.

Last season, the Scotties were on the rise. They played stingy defense and got just enough offense to have a very successful 6-2 season.

With 20 experienced eighth-graders moving on to the varsity program, the Scots expected to be down a bit this season.

But no one expected the Scotties to be 0-5 at this point of the 2013 season.

Southmoreland lost for the fifth time Oct. 9, when Indiana handed the Scotties a 30-22 loss.

Indiana led, 24-0, at the half, but the Scotties did not go away quietly.

Southmoreland cut the lead to 24-6 early in the third quarter when Jaden Datz hauled in a 35-yard screen pass from Jonathan Leighty. Leighty then found Mark Farmer on a slant route on the two-point conversion to make it 24-8.

Cole Leasure recovered a fumble on the ensuing kickoff, and Farmer and Leighty hooked up once again, this time from 15 yards out and the Scotties were back in the game at 24-14. Leighty added the extra two points with a nifty run to cut the deficit to 24-16.

Indiana upped its lead to 30-16 when Tom Evans scored his third touchdown of the game early in the final period.

Datz cut the lead to 30-22 when he scored with 40 seconds left in the game on a jet sweep.

Indiana fell on the ball when Southmoreland tried another onside kick and ran out the clock to hang on to the win.

“We were proud of the way the kids showed some heart and determination and made a strong comeback,” Russin said. “They never gave up and finally played four full quarters even though the score was not in our favor.”

As of press time, the Scotties had two games remaining this season.

Mark King is a contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.