ShareThis Page

Scottdale Parks Commission looks to 'adopt' borough parks

| Wednesday, July 16, 2014, 9:01 p.m.

Members of the Scottdale Parks Commission are working out the details to implement a new Adopt-a-Park program that was the idea of commission member Jason Ware.

Colleen Kenney, president of the parks commission, said Ware brought the idea to the attention of his fellow commission members. They were impressed with the participation of neighbors during a cleanup day at Pittsburgh Street Park.

“He thought if we could get the neighbors and businesses to take the initiative and take care of the park closest to them, sort of like the Adopt-a-Highway program, it would really be a benefit to the borough and the whole community,” she said.

Ideas that could be considered include having the group of residents or businesses to schedule cleanup days to pick up garbage in the parks or paint playground equipment if needed.

But the idea would be more than just the physical upkeep.

Borough Manager Angelo Pallone said such a group could report any concerns about the park or alert police to any suspicious activities in the park.

“I think this would be a great program,” he said. “Everything we do with the parks comes out of our general fund unless we get grants, so having residents or businesses helping us with these kinds of things would be a good thing.”

Kenney said there are seven parks that need attention, including cleaning and updating.

“We're brainstorming right now to try and figure out how to implement the program with the neighbors of the parks,” she said, adding the parks commission thought about mailing fliers to the neighbors and inviting them to a parks commission meeting to discuss the program.

The parks commission meets at 6 p.m. the fourth Wednesday of every month in the lobby of the Scottdale Borough Building.

Rachel Basinger is a contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.