'Pink house' can be used as youth center
A proposed youth center at the so-called “pink house” on Beaver Street can move forward as a principal use, Sewickley's zoning board members agreed.
Zoning board members last week overturned borough code enforcement officer Nancy Watts' ruling that the building at 202 Beaver St. could not be used as a youth center by The Presbyterian Church, Sewickley.
Zoning board member James Eichenlaub said Watt's decision did not “acknowledge that the uses comply with the current definition of principal use.”
Church leaders have proposed using the “pink house” for a variety of programming and other events.
Zoning board members also granted a conditional use application to allow the church to move forward with the youth center in a single-family residential district. Despite the decision from zoning board, church lawyer Michael Parris said he will continue to seek a decision on two separate plans filed by the church — one which retains the “pink house” and another that would demolish the home, creating a new structure.
“I do not wish to withdraw either plan,” he said.
Church leaders initially announced plans to raze the house to make way for a structure that would offer additional gathering and meeting space, parking and green space.
Those plans changed when organizers of grassroots Save the Pink House group pleaded with church leaders to keep the late 1800s-built home standing.
In June, Save the Pink House members agreed to raise up to $200,000 of the $1.6 million church leaders have estimated would be needed to redo the house.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.