ShareThis Page

Leetsdale adopts social media policy

| Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2012, 8:56 p.m.

Leetsdale employees who comment on stories about the borough now must acknowledge they work for the town.

“When they are using social media — whether it is their own Twitter account or Facebook page or make comments that relate to the borough — they clearly disclose that it is their opinion and not necessarily the opinion or position of the borough,” solicitor Megan Ott said.

Ott said the policy, adopted by council last week, is not meant to hinder public comment, but to release the borough from being linked to an employee's opinion.

“The idea is that, while everyone has their First Amendment rights, because they are employees of the borough, you want to make sure that it is clear that they are communicating in their opinion that they are doing so in a way that is respectful and not profane and also it is clear that they are doing so as an individual and not as a borough employee,” Ott said.

Ott said she had no “indication that this is a problem (in Leetsdale) right now.”

She said government agencies should adopt policies regarding comments made online by employees, calling it a “proactive” matter.

The social media policy also incorporates comments from citizens and organizations made on online material owned by the borough.

“If there were people or organizations who were posting profane, inappropriate, discriminatory types of things, then you, as a municipality … have a right to remove them,” Ott said.

Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.