Quaker Valley's decision on substitute custodians draws fire
Quaker Valley School Board's move to outsource its substitute custodial services was met with caution from one board member.
District officials will begin using Kelly Educational Staffing when fill-in janitors are needed following an 8-1 vote last week.
But board member Gianni Floro, who voted against the proposal, raised concerns about the move.
“You cannot privatize public education,” Floro said.
“The next thing we're going to be doing is outsourcing teachers.”
Board member David Pusateri said no other outsourcing of district staff has been discussed.
“There has been absolutely no discussion of outsourcing anything else besides (substitute) cleaning services,” he said.
On its website, Kelly Education Staffing says it is the “largest provider of substitute teachers nationwide.”
The company also offers “management and placement of … non-educational staff such as office clerical, administrative, food service, janitors (and) school nurses,” according to its website.
District administrators already use another third-party company for substitute teachers, Superintendent Joseph Clapper said.
Floro said athletics organizers and other district departments “often call on custodial services to open facilities” for sports and to provide cleanup from events.
“We are losing control over our staff,” Floro said.
Board member Debbie Miller said “it is extremely difficult to find pools of substitute housekeeping personnel.”
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.