Crosswalk at Quaker Valley High School enlarged
As Quaker Valley School District officials consider long-term efforts to solve drop-off issues at the high school, Leetsdale Council members have increased the size of a crosswalk used by students.
A crosswalk at Beaver Street and Valley Lane was enlarged to encompass the entire intersection.
“There has been some discussion about kids not using the crosswalk to cross the street and putting themselves in jeopardy,” council President Joe McGurk said.
McGurk said enlarging the crosswalk is “in lieu of getting a crossing guard because these are senior high kids.”
McGurk said borough leaders opted not to consider a crossing guard because, he said, he was unsure parents dropping children off would obey a crossing guard. He said students “basically can't avoid” the crosswalk.
“This is one way to satisfy the school (and) one way to satisfy the borough in making it safer for the kids to cross.”
School board members in the spring voted to spend $400,000 to purchase two homes along Beaver Street as part of a plan to consider adding a parking lot to allow for on-site student drop-off.
District officials and homeowners of one remaining property have not been able to come to an agreement.
School administrators and board members said any long-term recommendations would be part of an ongoing process that would include a committee made up of school personnel and community members to determine what the district could do to alleviate what school officials say has been a problem at the high school for more than a decade.
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or email@example.com.
Add Bobby Cherry to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.