Reassessments have Leetsdale property tax rates in limbo
Leetsdale Borough's millage rate is set at 8.5 mills, down from 10 mills in 2012.
Council President Joe McGurk initially suggested a 6.7-millage rate with an additional 1.3 mills allocated for road reconstruction.
But council members agreed Allegheny County's ongoing property real estate assessment dilemma could force millage changes in the future.
Under an order by Allegheny County Judge R. Stanton Wettick, municipalities have a few options when deciding a property tax millage rate, including changing their millage rate up until 10 days prior to property tax bills being mailed to property owners.
In Leetsdale's case, council members would have until sometime in late February or early March to change their minds.
In that scenario, an emergency meeting could be needed to approve any millage changes.
“There's no emergency here because, quite frankly, you're not going to know the real numbers until 2015 because this is going to go on for a long time,” council member Roger Nanni said of the county's assessment.
Nanni said he expects some of the larger property owners to receive some kind of assessment adjustment from an ongoing appeals process.
That, coupled with more than 100 abandoned properties, could keep the borough from collecting a larger number, Nanni said.
Still, Nanni said the borough's residents do not bear the tax burden.
“The economy might be bad in other places, but for Leetsdale Borough it's not that bad.”
Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.